| 
        
         
                            
       
                       
        
        
        
        
        
                
        
        
        
        EESemi.com Forum Archives 
		
		Analyzing 
		Open Pins Caused by a Wirebonding Problem 
                       
        
        
        
        
        
                
        
        
              
		        
         
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        Open pins 
		caused by wirebonding problems are 
		commonly encountered in the Failure Analysis 
		(FA) lab. The archived forum thread below discusses the typical FA 
		considerations when dealing with this failure mechanism.  These 
		considerations include being able to assess if the
		bond lifting failures are due to poor 
		intermetallic formation and if so, what could have caused such a problem 
		to arise.  EDX analysis is a common 
		tool used for detecting contaminants on the bond pads that could hamper 
		good intermetallic formation. 
		
           
          
		 
        
		
			
				
				
					
						| 
						 
						
						Posted by Sadoc: Thu 
						Dec 07, 2006 9:22 pm    Post 
						subject: FA for open issue  | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						hello all:  
						 
						I have some question for the fail mode for IC open 
						issure.  
						The fail mode as below:  
						 
						1.under the x- ray , no abnormal be observed. Gold ball 
						still on the pad,  
						and wire weep is ok. But in fact , the IC is open.  
						 
						2.after decap for the ball shear test or the neck pull 
						test, it always fail  
						pull value is nearly zero,same with shear.  
						 
						Could anyone tell me why?  | 
					 
				 
				 | 
			 
			
				|   | 
			 
			
				
				
					
						| 
						 
						
						Posted by FARel Engr: 
						Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:08 pm   
						 Post subject:   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						Hi Sadoc,  
						 
						Can you please describe the intermetallic coverage (IMC) 
						on the affected bond pads? If the IMC's are 
						insufficient, then you likely have a contam on the 
						surface of your bond pads that prevents good 
						intermetallic formation. If so, you need to have the 
						bond pads analyzed with EDX to determine the nature of 
						the contaminants.  
						 
						Good Luck!  
						 
						FARel Engr  | 
					 
				 
				 | 
			 
			
				|   | 
			 
			
				
				
					
						| 
						 
						
						Posted by Sadoc: Thu 
						Dec 07, 2006 10:40 pm    Post 
						subject:   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						Thanks for your reply.  
						OK, well i don't really sure the IMC percentage, but 
						there are some au-al left on the pad, i guess may be for 
						70% or higher.  
						 
						I can show you the EDX atomic confirm result  
						1.test on the left gold area ,C 
						29.51%,O:32.67%,AL:10.43%,AU:27.39%  
						2.test on the pad 
						,C:20.46%,O:4.71%,AL:67.56%,Si:2.83%,Ti:2.44%  
						 
						SO, how about the O good or bad for the bondability?  
						and the how about the C, is it show up for the normal or 
						abnormal?  | 
					 
				 
				 | 
			 
			
				|   | 
			 
			
				
				
					
						| 
						 
						
						Posted by FARel Engr: 
						Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:01 pm   
						 Post subject:   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						Hi Sadoc,  
						 
						If 70% IMC is left on the bond pad, then that means you 
						have very good intermetallic formation, so surface 
						contam may not be your issue. You must then ask yourself 
						why the bonds are lifting even if the IMC's are so good. 
						Is there a possibility that you've overbonded them?  
						 
						The high % of C and O are a bit abnormal. Also, if you 
						are detecting the Ti metal under the bond pad, then you 
						are doing the EDX analysis at a very high EHT. Please do 
						the EDX analysis at a much lower EHT, say 5 keV so that 
						what you'll get are data from the surface of the bond 
						pad, and nowhere else. Do the EDX analysis at 10 keV as 
						well for comparison.  
						 
						BTW, what is your bond pad metal's composition? Is it 
						doped with Si? Why are you seeing Si in the bond pad 
						itself?  
						 
						FARel Engr  | 
					 
				 
				 | 
			 
			
				|   | 
			 
			
				
				
					
						| 
						 
						
						Posted by Logan218142: 
						Sat Dec 16, 2006 4:10 pm   
						 Post subject:   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						   | 
					 
					
						| 
						 
						
						Hi... do we know which point you 
						detected 'open' fail, is this a time zero fail from SMT 
						line or reliability or field failure?  
						 
						On PFA side, is there any SAM analysis or X-section 
						done? Any specific site/pads having 'open connections'
						 
						 
						Do you observe ductile structure or micro-voids of IMC 
						on 'open' bonding pads?   | 
					 
				 
				 | 
			 
			 
        
          
      
        
        
		Back to the 'Best of Forums' Archives 
                       
        
        
        
        
        
                
        
        
              
         
        
         
        HOME 
		
          
                       
        
        
        
        
        
              
         
         
            Copyright
        © 
            2008
        EESemi.com.
        All Rights Reserved.  | 
     
   
  				 
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
		 |